Polyhydroxy Acids (PHAs) in Skincare
Polyhydroxy acids are used for surface exfoliation and hydration support, but they are not one interchangeable active. Gluconolactone has the clearest direct human evidence, and the finished formula matters more than the PHA label alone.
- Aliases
- PHA, PHAs, Polyhydroxy Acid, Polyhydroxy Acids
- Ingredient category
- Exfoliant, Humectant
- Most relevant for
- Dryness, Dullness, Rough and Bumpy Skin
- Evidence strength
- Some Support for Improving skin hydration with topical gluconolactone treatments
- Formula matters
- The exact acid, concentration, pH, contact time, product format, and moisturizing base all affect results; evidence for gluconolactone should not be applied automatically to every PHA.
- Separate product needed?
- Usually No. A separate PHA step is optional; use one when you need extra texture or dullness support and stronger exfoliants are unnecessary or harder to tolerate.
BB takeaway
PHAs can be useful for gentler exfoliation, but the best evidence belongs to gluconolactone rather than the whole category. Choose the complete formula and do not assume a higher percentage or PHA label means better results.
Ingredient evidence does not prove the performance of every finished product containing it.
What are polyhydroxy acids?
Polyhydroxy acids are a family of hydroxy acids used in skincare for surface exfoliation and moisture support. The shorthand names PHA and PHAs describe the category rather than one single ingredient.
Gluconolactone is the PHA shoppers are most likely to see on an ingredient list and has the clearest direct human evidence for everyday skincare. Lactobionic acid is also commonly grouped with PHAs in cosmetic marketing, although scientific literature sometimes describes it separately as a bionic acid.[1]
That distinction matters because gluconolactone, lactobionic acid, galactose, and other related materials are not interchangeable versions of one active. Evidence for one should not automatically be applied to another.
What do polyhydroxy acids do for skin?
PHAs are used mainly to loosen surface buildup so rough or dull-looking skin feels smoother and looks brighter.
Gluconolactone also has humectant properties. Small human studies found increased skin hydration after topical gluconolactone treatments, with no clear hydration advantage for 30% over 10% in the tested peel-style regimen.[2]
That combination of exfoliation and moisture support makes PHAs a possible option if you find stronger acid formulas drying or uncomfortable.
PHAs are not established as universal acne treatments, scar removers, pigment treatments, wrinkle treatments, or replacements for sunscreen. A finished product may address one of those concerns because of the complete formula or product-specific evidence.
What the evidence says about polyhydroxy acid skincare
The evidence is most useful for gluconolactone, and much of it comes from small studies or specific treatment regimens.
A split-face study in 16 healthy women compared 10% and 30% gluconolactone solutions over three treatments. Both concentrations increased hydration, and the higher concentration did not produce significantly greater hydration.[2]
A later split-face study in 16 women using the same concentrations found reductions in transepidermal water loss at several facial sites after three peel treatments. Again, the higher concentration did not consistently outperform the lower one.[3]
A 12-week clinical study compared a gluconolactone-containing PHA regimen with a glycolic-acid AHA regimen in people with photoaged skin. Both regimens improved several appearance measures. The glycolic-acid regimen performed better on some endpoints, while the PHA regimen caused less stinging and burning.[4]
That supports gluconolactone as a potentially better-tolerated exfoliating option for some shoppers. It does not prove that every PHA product is gentler than every AHA product because complete multi-product regimens were compared, and the authors were affiliated with NeoStrata.
There is also older acne evidence. A 1992 double-blind trial in 150 people compared 14% gluconolactone lotion, its vehicle, and 5% benzoyl peroxide for mild-to-moderate acne. Both active treatments reduced inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions, with fewer adverse effects reported with gluconolactone.[5]
That trial is more than three decades old and tested one treatment lotion. It is not a reason to treat an ordinary PHA toner as equivalent to modern first-line acne treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, or a retinoid.
For your routine, the evidence supports gluconolactone as a useful exfoliating and hydration-supporting ingredient. It does not establish every ingredient sold under the PHA label as equally effective.
How polyhydroxy acid form and formulation affect results
The first question is which PHA or PHA-adjacent ingredient the product actually contains.
Gluconolactone has the clearest direct human evidence. Lactobionic acid is frequently marketed as a PHA but has a different structure and evidence base. A front-label “PHA blend” does not tell you how much of each ingredient is present or whether the blend has been clinically tested.
Concentration is not a quality score. In the small gluconolactone studies comparing 10% and 30%, the higher concentration did not consistently produce better hydration or barrier-related measurements.[2][3]
pH, leave-on versus rinse-off format, contact time, frequency, solvents, humectants, emollients, and other exfoliating ingredients can all change activity and irritation. A cleanser containing gluconolactone and a leave-on peel should not be expected to behave the same way simply because the ingredient lists overlap.
A PHA product with glycerin, ceramides, panthenol, or other moisturizing ingredients may also feel very different from a thin acid solution at the same headline percentage.
Who may benefit from polyhydroxy acid skincare?
PHA skincare can make sense if you want mild surface exfoliation for roughness or dullness but find stronger acid formulas difficult to tolerate.
It can also be useful when exfoliation and dryness overlap because gluconolactone has human evidence for hydration and barrier-related measurements as well as exfoliating use.
That does not make PHA automatically suitable for sensitive skin. Fragrance, alcohol, other acids, retinoids, low pH, high concentration, or frequent use can still make a finished product irritating.
If clogged pores or acne are the main concern, salicylic acid has a more established modern role. If roughness and dullness already respond well to a tolerated lactic acid or glycolic acid product, there is no reason to switch simply because PHA sounds gentler.
Polyhydroxy acid side effects and irritation risk
PHAs are often marketed as gentle, but irritation is still possible.
A PHA product can cause stinging, redness, dryness, tightness, or peeling depending on the specific acid, concentration, pH, frequency, and complete formula.
The best current cosmetic safety conclusion is ingredient-specific rather than category-wide. In a safety assessment published in 2026, the Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety concluded that gluconolactone is safe in cosmetics under the present practices of use and concentrations described in the assessment. The available data were insufficient for the panel to make the same determination for galactonolactone, glucarolactone, glucoheptonolactone, and ribonolactone.[6]
Insufficient data do not mean those ingredients are proven unsafe. It means the panel did not have enough evidence to reach a safety conclusion.
If a PHA product causes persistent burning, swelling, severe redness, blistering, or worsening irritation, stop using it rather than assuming a “gentle acid” needs an adjustment period.
How to use polyhydroxy acids in your skincare routine
Follow the directions for the exact product. A cleanser, toner, serum, moisturizer, and peel do not need the same frequency or contact time.
For a leave-on exfoliating product, starting at the lowest frequency allowed by the directions can make it easier to judge tolerance.
If your routine already contains glycolic acid, lactic acid, salicylic acid, retinoids, or another exfoliating treatment, adding a PHA may simply duplicate the same job. More exfoliation is not automatically better.
Use broad-spectrum sunscreen every day. PHA does not replace sun protection, especially when dullness or uneven tone is part of the reason you are exfoliating.
How long do polyhydroxy acids take to work?
A PHA formula may make skin feel smoother or more hydrated fairly quickly, but some of that immediate effect can come from the moisturizing base.
Small gluconolactone studies measured hydration and transepidermal-water-loss changes after several treatments, while the photoaging comparison assessed visible changes over 12 weeks.[2][3][4]
There is no dependable category-wide timeline because the specific acid, concentration, pH, format, frequency, and concern all vary.
What can you use with polyhydroxy acids?
PHAs fit easily with moisturizing ingredients such as glycerin, ceramides, niacinamide, panthenol, squalane, and other humectants and emollients.
They can also be used in routines containing retinoids, AHAs, or salicylic acid when the overall routine remains comfortable.
Compatibility does not mean you need to layer multiple exfoliants together. If stinging, redness, peeling, or tightness develops, reducing overlapping exfoliation is more useful than relying on PHA’s gentler reputation.
How to choose a polyhydroxy acid product
Start by checking which acid the formula actually contains.
Gluconolactone has the clearest direct human evidence among ingredients commonly marketed under the PHA label. If a brand uses a proprietary PHA complex, look for the underlying INCI ingredients and finished-product testing.
Match the format to the job. A leave-on toner or serum gives more contact time for exfoliation, while a moisturizer may be a better choice when hydration and comfort are the priority.
Do not automatically choose the highest percentage. Small human studies have not shown a simple “more gluconolactone is better” relationship for hydration or barrier measurements.
Be cautious with “safe for all sensitive skin,” “zero irritation,” “acne treatment,” “clinical resurfacing,” or “professional peel results” claims unless the finished product has evidence that supports them.
PHAs alone do not justify Premium pricing. Pay more only when the complete formula offers a meaningful advantage in tolerability, moisturizing support, texture, packaging, or credible finished-product testing.
Do you need a separate polyhydroxy acid product?
Usually, no.
A separate PHA product can make sense when rough texture or dullness remains a real concern and stronger exfoliants have been uncomfortable or unnecessary.
If you already use a well-tolerated AHA, salicylic acid, or retinoid that handles texture well, adding a PHA toner or serum is likely to duplicate an existing step.
PHA is most useful as an alternative, not an obligation. Choose it when its balance of exfoliation, hydration, and tolerability fits your routine better than another approach.
The BB Perspective
Polyhydroxy acids are a useful exfoliating family, but the category is less interchangeable than beauty marketing makes it sound.
Gluconolactone has the strongest direct human evidence, including small studies showing improved hydration and barrier-related measurements and a regimen study suggesting better tolerability than a glycolic-acid routine. That evidence should not be automatically transferred to every ingredient sold under a PHA label.
The best PHA product for you is not necessarily the strongest or most expensive one. It is the formula that gives enough exfoliation to improve roughness or dullness without creating a new irritation problem—and only if your routine actually needs another exfoliating step.
Last reviewed: September 2026
Sources
Kornhauser A, Coelho SG, Hearing VJ. Effects of cosmetic formulations containing hydroxyacids on sun-exposed skin: current applications and future developments. Dermatology Research and Practice. 2012;2012:710893. doi:10.1155/2012/710893. PMID:22675344. PMCID:PMC3362829.
This review discusses alpha hydroxy acids, polyhydroxy acids, and bionic acids and is useful for classification and formulation context. It distinguishes PHA and related bionic-acid terminology and does not establish that all materials in these groups have identical efficacy. The authors were affiliated with the U.S. FDA Office of Cosmetics and Colors and the National Cancer Institute. Return to citation.
Jarząbek-Perz S, Mucha P, Rotsztejn H. Corneometric evaluation of skin moisture after application of 10% and 30% gluconolactone. Skin Research and Technology. 2021;27(5):925-930. doi:10.1111/srt.13044. PMID:33769633.
This split-face study included 16 healthy women who received three treatments with 10% gluconolactone on one side of the face and 30% on the other. Hydration increased after treatment, with no significant hydration advantage for the higher concentration. The small sample and peel-style treatment series limit how broadly the findings apply to ordinary retail skincare. Return to citation.
Jarząbek-Perz S, Dziedzic M, Rotsztejn H, Kołodziejczak A. Evaluation of the effects of 10% and 30% gluconolactone chemical peel on sebum, pH, and TEWL. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2023;22(12):3305-3312. doi:10.1111/jocd.15864. PMID:37335807.
This split-face study included 16 women who received three gluconolactone peel procedures at 10% and 30%. Transepidermal water loss decreased at several sites, and the higher concentration did not consistently outperform the lower one. The very small sample and peel format limit direct translation to everyday leave-on products. Return to citation.
Edison BL, Green BA, Wildnauer RH, Sigler ML. A polyhydroxy acid skin care regimen provides antiaging effects comparable to an alpha-hydroxyacid regimen. Cutis. 2004;73(2 Suppl):14-17. PMID:15002657.
This 12-week study compared complete gluconolactone-containing PHA and glycolic-acid AHA regimens. Both improved several photoaging measures; the PHA regimen caused less stinging and burning, while the AHA regimen performed better on some endpoints. Because complete regimens were tested, the findings cannot be assigned to gluconolactone alone. The authors were affiliated with NeoStrata Company. Return to citation.
Hunt MJ, Barnetson RStC. A comparative study of gluconolactone versus benzoyl peroxide in the treatment of acne. Australasian Journal of Dermatology. 1992;33(3):131-134. doi:10.1111/j.1440-0960.1992.tb00100.x. PMID:1303072.
This double-blind trial included 150 people with mild-to-moderate acne and compared 14% gluconolactone lotion, its vehicle, and 5% benzoyl peroxide. Both active treatments reduced inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions, with fewer reported side effects for gluconolactone. The study is more than three decades old and tested a specific treatment lotion, so it should not be generalized to current cosmetic PHA products or treated as modern guideline-level acne evidence. Return to citation.
Ferguson P, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, et al. Safety Assessment of Glycolactones as Used in Cosmetics. International Journal of Toxicology. 2026;45(2 Suppl):124S-134S. doi:10.1177/10915818261455261. PMID:42249663.
The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety assessed five glycolactone ingredients and concluded that Gluconolactone is safe in cosmetics under the present practices of use and concentrations described. Available data were insufficient to determine the safety of Galactonolactone, Glucarolactone, Glucoheptonolactone, and Ribonolactone under intended cosmetic use. Insufficient data do not establish that those ingredients are unsafe. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. Cosmetic Ingredient Review is funded by the Personal Care Products Council, a cosmetics-industry trade association. Return to citation.