Growth Factors in Skincare

IngredientBrief™

Growth factors are signaling proteins used mainly in anti-aging skincare. Some finished formulas modestly improve fine lines and texture, but the category is not standardized and product-specific testing matters most.

Ingredient category
Conditioning Agent
Most relevant for
Fine Lines and Wrinkles, Rough and Bumpy Skin
Evidence strength
Some Support for Improving visible fine lines and rough texture with topical growth-factor finished formulations
Formula matters
Ingredient source, protein stability, pH, vehicle, delivery system, packaging, storage, supporting ingredients, and finished-product testing determine performance; evidence for one proprietary formula should not be transferred to another.
Separate product needed?
Usually No. Most routines do not need a separate growth-factor serum; it is an optional anti-aging step when the exact product has credible testing and fills a real gap.

BB takeaway

Growth factors have legitimate but modest product-specific evidence. Judge the exact finished formula and its testing rather than paying for regenerative language, source stories, or a large complex percentage.

Ingredient evidence does not prove the performance of every finished product containing it.

What are growth factors?

Growth factors are signaling proteins used in some anti-aging skincare formulas. The label can refer to individual factors such as EGF, lab-produced proteins, conditioned media, or proprietary mixtures containing several signaling ingredients.[1]

That variety matters when you shop. “Growth factors” is a category, not one standardized ingredient, so evidence for one proprietary serum does not automatically apply to another.

Growth factors are also different from exosomes, PDRN, and ordinary peptides. Similar marketing language does not make these technologies interchangeable.

What do growth factors do for skin?

The most credible cosmetic goals are improving the look of fine lines, rough texture, and other visible signs of photoaging.

Some growth factors are involved in collagen-related and repair pathways in living tissue. That biology makes the category interesting, but it does not prove that every topical serum creates a meaningful visible result.

Growth factors do not replace sunscreen or a well-supported retinoid. For most shoppers, they are an optional extra after the basics are already covered.

What the evidence says about growth factor skincare

Growth factors have some support for modest improvement in fine lines and skin texture, but the evidence belongs mainly to specific finished formulas rather than the entire category.

A 2023 systematic review found 33 prospective studies covering 23 different topical growth-factor preparations. Overall improvements in fine lines, texture, and facial appearance were usually modest, and many studies were small.[1]

One controlled study found better improvement in fine lines and wrinkles from a proprietary multi-ingredient growth-factor gel than from its base formula after three months.[2] Another small study found that two different growth-factor formulas both improved from baseline, but neither clearly outperformed the other.[3]

For your routine, the practical conclusion is narrower than the marketing: some finished products have credible evidence for modest improvement, but the ingredient label or source story alone is not enough. Look for testing on the exact formula you are considering.

How growth factor form and formulation affect results

Growth-factor skincare can use very different source materials and signaling systems, so products should not be treated as interchangeable.

These proteins can also be difficult to formulate. Stability, pH, storage, packaging, and delivery all affect whether a product remains active enough to matter.[4]

Claims such as “encapsulated growth factors” or “advanced delivery technology” do not by themselves prove better penetration, stability, or visible results.

Be careful with headline percentages too. A large “growth-factor complex” percentage may refer to a blend or solution rather than the amount of signaling protein itself.

Who may benefit from growth factor skincare?

Growth-factor skincare makes the most sense if you want another aging-focused step for fine lines and rough texture after establishing sunscreen and moisturizer.

It is most compelling when the exact product has human testing and the price is reasonable for the evidence behind it.

It is less compelling if you still need to establish the basics, already use a retinoid or another anti-aging serum that is working well, or would have to spend heavily just to add another signaling-focused product.

Growth factors are not the obvious first choice for acne, melasma, rosacea, eczema, or other concerns with better-established treatment options.

Growth factors side effects and irritation risk

Topical growth-factor products were generally well tolerated in the facial-rejuvenation studies included in the 2023 review, but most studies were small and short.[1]

The complete formula can be the more immediate source of irritation. Fragrance, preservatives, retinoids, exfoliating acids, or other actives can cause redness, stinging, itching, or a rash even when the growth-factor system itself is well tolerated.

Use ordinary retail serums only as directed. Products intended for everyday intact skin should not automatically be treated as procedure aftercare.

How to use growth factors in your skincare routine

Follow the directions for the exact product. Most leave-on growth-factor serums are applied after cleansing and before moisturizer.

You do not need to apply extra product to get a stronger effect. Use the recommended amount consistently and judge whether the formula adds anything meaningful to your routine.

In the morning, finish with broad-spectrum sunscreen. Growth-factor skincare does not prevent UV damage.

If your routine already contains several actives, introduce the growth-factor serum by itself first so you can tell whether it improves your skin or simply adds cost and complexity.

How long do growth factors take to work?

Do not expect an overnight result.

Studies in the 2023 systematic review generally evaluated products over weeks to several months, and some controlled studies assessed visible changes after about three months.[1][2]

Immediate softness, glow, or plumping is more likely to come from moisturizing and film-forming ingredients in the base than from long-term signaling effects.

If a costly serum is not making a meaningful visible difference with consistent use over the timeframe supported by its own testing, the biological story is not a good reason to keep repurchasing it.

What can you use with growth factors?

Growth-factor serums can fit into routines with common moisturizers, antioxidants, niacinamide, vitamin C, peptides, and retinoids.

There is no universal rule requiring growth factors to be separated from vitamin C, retinol, or niacinamide simply because of the ingredient names. The more important question is whether the full routine remains comfortable.

Hydrating ingredients such as glycerin and hyaluronic acid can improve the immediate feel of a growth-factor serum.

How to choose a growth factor product

Start with the evidence, not the regenerative-sounding language.

Look for a clear description of what the product contains, human testing on the exact formula, evidence relevant to ordinary intact facial skin, and sensible information about packaging, storage, and shelf life.

Be cautious with vague terms such as “stem cell technology,” “regenerative complex,” or “cell communication” when the brand does not explain the actual ingredient system or show product-level testing.

FDA distinguishes ordinary cosmetic appearance claims from claims that a product treats disease or changes the structure or function of the body.[5]

Growth factors do not automatically justify Premium pricing. Pay more only when the finished product gives you something meaningful in return, such as stronger evidence, better stability, better tolerability, or a formula you genuinely prefer using.

Do you need a separate growth factor serum?

Usually, no.

A separate serum can make sense when fine lines and rough texture are priorities, your basic routine is already working well, and the exact product has credible human testing that justifies its price.

It is also reasonable to skip the category entirely. The current evidence supports modest improvement from some formulas, not a result so large that every anti-aging routine needs one.

The BB Perspective

Growth factors are a legitimate skincare category with real human evidence, but the marketing has moved faster than the science.

The strongest case is for modest improvement in fine lines and texture from specific finished formulas. The evidence does not show that every growth-factor serum or proprietary complex performs the same way.

Do not buy the source story, futuristic language, or biggest percentage. Buy the exact formula only when its testing, stability, tolerability, and price make sense.

Last reviewed: September 2026

Sources

  1. Quinlan DJ, Ghanem AM, Hassan H. Topical growth factor preparations for facial skin rejuvenation: A systematic review. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2023;22(7):2023-2039. doi:10.1111/jocd.15644.

    This systematic review included 33 prospective studies, 1,180 participants, 23 different preparations, and nine randomized controlled trials. Improvements were generally modest, and products varied substantially in source, composition, and outcome measures. The authors reported no funding and no financial interests in the products or devices reviewed. Return to citation.

  2. Mehta RC, Smith SR, Grove GL, et al. Reduction in facial photodamage by a topical growth factor product. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2008;7(9):864-871.

    This double-blind study randomized 60 people with facial photodamage to a proprietary multi-component gel or its vehicle. The active formula produced greater improvement in fine lines and wrinkles after three months. The lead author was affiliated with SkinMedica. Return to citation.

  3. Wu DC, Goldman MP. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial comparing the efficacy of two topical human growth factors for the rejuvenation of the aging face. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology. 2017;10(5):31-35.

    This three-month split-face study involved 20 women with facial wrinkling from photodamage. Both formulas improved from baseline, but neither clearly outperformed the other. The study was small and funded by Nuderm. Dr. Goldman disclosed consulting relationships with Nuderm and SkinMedica; Dr. Wu reported no relevant conflicts. Return to citation.

  4. Eskens O, Amin S. Challenges and effective routes for formulating and delivery of epidermal growth factors in skin care. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2021;43(2):123-130. doi:10.1111/ics.12685.

    This review explains topical growth-factor delivery and stability challenges including molecular size, protein instability, pH, temperature, storage, and formula interactions. Return to citation.

  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Cosmetics Labeling Claims.

    FDA explains that cosmetic claims must be truthful and not misleading and that claims to treat disease or affect body structure or function can move a product into drug territory. Return to citation.